ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Environment
  • Companies
  • Investors
  • Governance
  • Markets
  • Social
  • Regulators
  • Sustainable Finance
Featured Posts
    • Companies
    Next faces HMRC probe over incorrect staff payments
    • August 7, 2022
    • Latest News
    Tensions ratchet up in Gaza as Israeli strike kills second militant leader
    • August 7, 2022
    • Latest News
    UK to review Macquarie’s £4.2bn deal for National Grid’s gas business
    • August 7, 2022
    • Latest News
    The challenges for Latin America’s new left
    • August 7, 2022
    • Latest News
    Disengaged, indifferent, deluded? Why young workers have an image problem
    • August 7, 2022
Featured Categories
Belarussia
View Posts
Companies
View Posts
Energy
View Posts
Environment
View Posts
Food
View Posts
Governance
View Posts
Health
View Posts
Investors
View Posts
Latest News
View Posts
Markets
View Posts
Potash
View Posts
Regulators
View Posts
Russsia
View Posts
Social
View Posts
Supply Chain
View Posts
Sustainable Finance
View Posts
Technology
View Posts
Uncategorized
View Posts
ESG Telegraph ESG Telegraph
7K
9K
4K
1K
ESG Telegraph ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Environment
  • Companies
  • Investors
  • Governance
  • Markets
  • Social
  • Regulators
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Companies

The BBC needs defenders in an age of misinformation

  • January 19, 2022
  • Staff
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

Auntie’s being put through the wringer again. There has been a fresh round of calls this week to “defund the BBC”, following culture secretary Nadine Dorries’ ham-fisted attempt to divert attention from the latest round of Downing Street “partygate” revelations by threatening to scrap the public broadcaster’s licence fee — an idea from which she was later forced to retreat.

Attacks on the BBC came from all sides. “What I see and hear is a massive platform for every far-right blowhard who can generate some noise on social media, while almost everyone to the left of Keir Starmer is persona non grata,” tweeted Guardian columnist George Monbiot.

At the other end of the spectrum, former Daily Telegraph editor Charles Moore — once the prime minister’s boss — declared that the BBC has been behaving like “the Fox News of the Left”. The broadcaster, Moore wrote, needed to show not just impartiality — which director-general Tim Davie has repeatedly said must be a priority — but “super-impartiality”, whatever that might mean. GB News presenter Dan Wootton raged that during the pandemic “the BBC’s coverage has been nothing short of a disgrace”.

Such views are hardly borne out by the public, measured either by viewing or polling figures. In March 2020, when Britain went into its first lockdown, the BBC’s nightly news audience soared to 15m. According to the broadcaster’s latest annual report, 8 out of 10 British adults continue to use at least one BBC news service a week. The UK regulator Ofcom’s latest report shows the BBC takes up seven spots in the top-20 most-used news sources. More than two-thirds of the public say the BBC is effective at providing news and current affairs coverage that is “trustworthy”, while 49 per cent cite the BBC as the source they turn to for news they most trust.

Some, such as anti-Brexit campaigner and lawyer Jolyon Maugham, say such dominance is unhealthy, as it means the BBC can rely on residual trust rather than having to earn it. Maugham also complains that the BBC’s survival is “contingent on pleasing those in power”. But neither of these criticisms seem fair — the broadcaster is as often criticised for being too aggressive as it is for being too cosy with politicians.

The idea that getting rid of BBC News, as Maugham advocates, might somehow improve the media landscape is a fallacy. Part of the reason that the UK is less susceptible to online disinformation than some other countries is that the national broadcaster sets a high standard for others to follow.

The truth is that the very fact the BBC is complained about so much by both sides of the political spectrum is proof that it is succeeding, at least to some extent, at providing balanced coverage. It is hard to imagine such denunciation from both sides in the highly polarised, commercially driven world of US media, where just 12 per cent of Republicans trust the Democrats’ favourite CNN, and just 14 per cent of Democrats trust the Republicans’ preferred Fox News.

When misinformation proliferates online and seeps out into the real world, with echo chambers splintering people into tribes that struggle to understand each other, having a single source of truth, flawed as it might be, is something we shouldn’t take for granted. “One of the fundamental principles of public service broadcasting is that it is universally available to all. This talk of getting rid of the licence fee and going to subscriptions by definition would lose that,” says Patrick Barwise, co-author of The War Against the BBC and emeritus professor of management and marketing at London Business School.

Even those who say they don’t want to be forced to pay for the service perhaps protest too much. In a so-called “deprivation study” in 2015 — commissioned by the BBC although carried out by an independent firm — more than two-thirds of those who had said they were opposed to paying the licence fee changed their minds just nine days after being cut off from the BBC’s services. Barwise says a new, yet-to-be-published study had almost identical findings.

We need to leave Auntie alone — she’s far from perfect, but our media landscape and, thus, our democracy, would surely be in much worse shape without her. That’s something worth defending, not defunding.

[email protected]

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
You May Also Like
Read More
  • Companies

Next faces HMRC probe over incorrect staff payments

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Merck defends tax approach against senator’s claims of avoidance

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

The end of the warehouse bubble

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Climate, war and inflation jolt reinsurers into action

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Sinema is significant beneficiary of private equity lobbying machine

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Travel: why airports lose your luggage

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Brompton’s Will Butler-Adams: ‘People have no idea what goes into a product. That’s not a good thing’

  • Staff
  • August 7, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Ad tracking by online gambling industry comes under scrutiny

  • Staff
  • August 6, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Next faces HMRC probe over incorrect staff payments
    • August 7, 2022
  • 2
    Tensions ratchet up in Gaza as Israeli strike kills second militant leader
    • August 7, 2022
  • 3
    UK to review Macquarie’s £4.2bn deal for National Grid’s gas business
    • August 7, 2022
  • 4
    The challenges for Latin America’s new left
    • August 7, 2022
  • 5
    Disengaged, indifferent, deluded? Why young workers have an image problem
    • August 7, 2022
Recent Posts
  • Colombia ushers in its most leftwing president
    • August 7, 2022
  • Merck defends tax approach against senator’s claims of avoidance
    • August 7, 2022
  • The west’s phantom energy sanctions fuel Russia’s war machine
    • August 7, 2022

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe now to our newsletter

ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Guest Post
  • Contact

Input your search keywords and press Enter.