ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Environment
  • Companies
  • Investors
  • Governance
  • Markets
  • Social
  • Regulators
  • Sustainable Finance
Featured Posts
    • Companies
    Container shipping’s tonnage tax trick
    • August 16, 2022
    • Latest News
    German recession fears deepen as economy is hit by ‘perfect storm’
    • August 16, 2022
    • Companies
    Gaming’s loot box — the slippery slope of paying for rewards
    • August 16, 2022
    • Latest News
    Liberals must overcome their aversion to conflict
    • August 16, 2022
    • Companies
    AstraZeneca sues former executive over move to rival GSK
    • August 16, 2022
Featured Categories
Belarussia
View Posts
Companies
View Posts
Energy
View Posts
Environment
View Posts
Food
View Posts
Governance
View Posts
Health
View Posts
Investors
View Posts
Latest News
View Posts
Markets
View Posts
Potash
View Posts
Regulators
View Posts
Russsia
View Posts
Social
View Posts
Supply Chain
View Posts
Sustainable Finance
View Posts
Technology
View Posts
Uncategorized
View Posts
ESG Telegraph ESG Telegraph
7K
9K
4K
1K
ESG Telegraph ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Latest News
  • Environment
  • Companies
  • Investors
  • Governance
  • Markets
  • Social
  • Regulators
  • Sustainable Finance
  • Companies

Jack Ma’s Ant Group implicated in corruption scandal by Chinese media

  • January 21, 2022
  • Staff
Total
0
Shares
0
0
0

China’s state broadcaster has implicated Jack Ma’s Ant Group in a corruption scandal, ratcheting up pressure on the billionaire following a crackdown that has wiped billions of dollars from his internet empire.

A documentary on state-run China Central Television alleged that private companies made “unreasonably high payments” to the brother of the former Chinese Communist party head of Hangzhou, an eastern city that is home to Ant Group’s headquarters, in return for government policy incentives and support with buying real estate.

According to public records and two sources close to the deals, a unit of Ant Group bought two plots of land at a discount in Hangzhou in 2019 after taking stakes in two mobile payment businesses owned by the party secretary’s younger brother that were named in the documentary.

While the documentary did not name Jack Ma’s company, the Ant unit was the only external corporate investor in one of these businesses, according to the public records, and was among three corporate investors in the second.

“The nature of such a transfer of interests is an exchange of power and capital,” said the documentary, produced by the Communist party’s Central Commission for Discipline Inspection. Material aired by China’s state broadcaster represents the official party line.

The programme has intensified pressure on Ant, as the fintech group with more than 1bn users struggles to overhaul its business to comply with authorities’ demands. Chinese regulators pulled the plug on a $37bn initial public offering planned by the company in 2020 and forced it to restructure.

Last week, Ant suffered a setback to its government-led reform efforts after a state-owned asset manager pulled out of a deal to invest in the fintech’s lending arm without explanation.

The documentary alleged that Zhou Jiangyong, the former Hangzhou party secretary who was arrested in August for corruption, helped unidentified companies acquire cheap land and enjoy preferential policies after they bought shares in firms controlled by the senior official’s younger brother, Zhou Jianyong.

The younger Zhou, a former business school professor, launched Youcheng United (Ningbo) Information Technology Development Co in 2016, winning contracts to build subway mobile payment systems in the coastal hubs of Ningbo and Wenzhou, according to the documentary. At the time, his brother was the party secretary of these cities.

“He won the business because I was a government official,” said Zhou, the former party secretary, about his brother in the documentary.

Ant entered into a series of deals with the younger Zhou. Public records show Shanghai Yunxin Venture Capital Management Co, a subsidiary of Ant, paid Rmb1.7m ($268,000) for a 14.3 per cent stake and a board seat in Youcheng United (Ningbo) in March 2019.

Later in the year, Shanghai Yunxin spent Rmb1.4m ($221,000) buying a 13.5 per cent stake in a Hangzhou-based subway payment provider owned by the junior Zhou and featured in the documentary, public records show. The Hangzhou company also includes a state-owned enterprise as an investor.

Less than a year after Ant completed the second investment, the fintech group won an auction for a plot in Hangzhou for Rmb5,194 ($819) per square metre as the only qualified bidder, land auction records show. Average home prices in the neighbourhood exceed Rmb45,000 ($7,100) per square metre, according to real estate websites.

In the documentary, the former party secretary’s brother claimed he charged a high price for investments in his companies.

“You of course know I am Zhou Jiangyong’s brother,” said Zhou Jianyong in the documentary. “You can imagine the price I raised. You want to take advantage of me. Shouldn’t I do the same to you?”

Ant Group did not respond to a request for comment. The Financial Times was unable to reach the Zhou brothers for comment.

“The rise and fall of Ant epitomises the unequal relationship between business and politics in China,” said Nie Huihua, a professor at Renmin University in Beijing.

Ma has kept a low profile while Ant and his ecommerce group Alibaba battle the mounting political pressure, as China’s president Xi Jinping embarks on a “common prosperity” campaign to overhaul the country’s business and political landscape.

“The rise of Ant has a lot to do with its ability to curry favour from local officials,” said a person close to the fintech group. “It may now pay a price for that.”

After the documentary aired, the Communist party’s graft fighting commission said it would step up oversight of the country’s biggest internet companies “to cut off the link between power and capital”.

Total
0
Shares
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
You May Also Like
Read More
  • Companies

Container shipping’s tonnage tax trick

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Gaming’s loot box — the slippery slope of paying for rewards

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

AstraZeneca sues former executive over move to rival GSK

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Calls mount to scrap annual rail fare rise in England

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Attack on Salman Rushdie underlines threats to free speech

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Darktrace/Thoma Bravo: cash bid would chase away the shadows

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Japan activism: Murakami spins persuasive narrative on Jafco

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022
Read More
  • Companies

Philips chief exits in wake of fallout from medical device recall

  • Staff
  • August 16, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Featured Posts
  • 1
    Container shipping’s tonnage tax trick
    • August 16, 2022
  • 2
    German recession fears deepen as economy is hit by ‘perfect storm’
    • August 16, 2022
  • 3
    Gaming’s loot box — the slippery slope of paying for rewards
    • August 16, 2022
  • 4
    Liberals must overcome their aversion to conflict
    • August 16, 2022
  • 5
    AstraZeneca sues former executive over move to rival GSK
    • August 16, 2022
Recent Posts
  • Sovereign debt architecture is messy and here to stay
    • August 16, 2022
  • Harvard to offer free MBA tuition to lowest-income students
    • August 16, 2022
  • Calls mount to scrap annual rail fare rise in England
    • August 16, 2022

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Subscribe now to our newsletter

ESG Telegraph
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Guest Post
  • Contact

Input your search keywords and press Enter.